�
Tobacco control programs tail reduce smoke, and when successful, they
reduce personal health forethought costs, according to a study released on
August 25, 2008 in the open-access journal PLoS Medicine.
The work specifically tracks the California Tobacco Control Program,
which was established in 1989 with the goal of changing social norms
surrounding tobacco use. Rather than focusing on adolescents, the
program targeted adult users, with the thought that change in young people
john be enabled by changes in the actions of their use models.
Though much has been postulated regarding the potential economic
effects of large-scale baccy programs, Stanton Glantz and colleagues
at the University of California San Francisco hoped to perform an
analysis to ascertain the actual human relationship. In their analysis, they
noted that the factors involved in health care expenditures may
fluctuate for many reasons that ar not related to patient habits, such
as changes in medical technology or demographic shifts. They used
regression analysis to minimise many of these personal effects to find out the
effects of the tobacco control program unequaled on health care
expenditures.
In California, 3.6 billion fewer packs of cigarettes were sold during
the 5 year row of the program. The tobacco industriousness did not gain and
estimated $9.2 one thousand million U.S. in pre-tax cigarette sales as a solution of
this.
Data in California was compared to a set of controls, the latter with
either no comprehensive tobacco control condition program earlier 2000 or
cigarette tax increases of $0.50 or more per load down over the period of
the study. Between 1989, when the program started, and 2004, there was
a nest egg of $86 billion U.S. in personal health forethought expenditure.
These nest egg in price grew, peaking at 7.3% in 2003-2004. Altogether,
this represents a 50-fold riposte on the $1.8 billion U.S. that were
invested in the program over this period.
The researchers item out that these economic indicators are of
significance, especially when comparing the money invested in tobacco
control programs with the large settlements and tobacco plant taxes
collected. In this study lies the number 1 evidence that tobacco control
programs actually reduce health care costs -- this only further
justifies the implementation of such programs.
According to a report of the Global Tobacco Epidemic in 2008 by the
W.H.O., all key tobacco plant control measures have not been implemented in
whatever given country. It to boot states that around the world, the
money gathered in baccy taxes each year is nearly D times the
money exhausted on tobacco control measures.
Effect of the California Tobacco Control Program on personal
health care expenditures.
Lightwood JM, Dinno A, Glantz SA
PLoS Med 5(8): e178.
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050178
Click
Here For Full Length Article
Written by Anna Sophia McKenney
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
More information
